Modified String Transformation with Custom Rules
Modified String Transformation with Custom Rules
Problem Statement
You're given:
-
A string
s
consisting of lowercase English letters. -
An integer
t
indicating the number of transformation steps. -
An array
nums
of size 26 wherenums[i]
tells how many next consecutive characters to replace each letter'a' + i
with.
In each transformation:
-
For a character
ch
, it transforms into the nextnums[ch - 'a']
characters in the alphabet. -
If it goes past
'z'
, it wraps around from'a'
.
Your goal: Return the final length of the transformed string after t
transformations. Since this can be large, return it modulo 10⁹ + 7.
Example
Input:
Transformation:
-
Step 1 → "a" → "b", "b" → "c", ..., "y" → "z"
→"bcdzz"
-
Step 2 → "b" → "c", "c" → "d", "d" → "e", "z" → "ab", "z" → "ab"
→"cdeabab"
Output: 7
Best Data Structure for the Job
No fancy DS required here. A fixed-size frequency array of length 26 suffices. It helps track how many times each character appears and simulates transformations without reconstructing the full string.
Different Approaches
1. Brute Force (String Construction) — TLE Magnet
Rebuild the entire string at each transformation step. Very intuitive, but blows up for larger t
.
2. Frequency Simulation — Optimized for Moderate t
Track only how many of each character exist. Avoids actual string building.
3. Matrix Exponentiation — Optimized for Large t (Up to 10⁹)
This is where we flex that big-brain math. Each transformation is just matrix multiplication. Raise the transformation matrix to power t
using fast exponentiation.
⚠️ Common Pitfalls
-
Ignoring Wrap-around: Forgetting
'z'
wraps back to'a'
will mess up your transformation. -
Modular Arithmetic Issues: Not applying
% MOD
properly at every step causes overflow. -
Trying to Store Full String: Leads to memory limits for large
t
.
📊 Complexity Recap
Approach | Time Complexity | Space Complexity |
---|---|---|
Brute Force | O(N × max(nums)^t) | High |
Frequency Array Simulation | O(t × 26 × max(nums)) | O(26) |
Matrix Exponentiation (Optimized) | O(26³ × log t) | O(26²) |
🌍 Real-World Use Cases
-
Text Generators & Morphing Algorithms: Rule-based pattern transformation engines.
-
Cryptographic Ciphers: Where deterministic transformation rules iterate over time.
-
DNA/RNA Simulation: Simulating generational transformations in genetic models.
-
Compression Predictions: Estimating growth or reduction in size due to repetitive transformations.
I hope you found this article insightful! Keep exploring, keep learning, and don’t forget to check back daily for more exciting problem breakdowns. If you know someone who would benefit from this, share it with them and help them grow too! That’s it for today—see you in the next post!
Signing off!!
Master DSA One Problem at a Time :)
Comments
Post a Comment