Twist, Turn, Repeat – The Art of Rotating Arrays

 Rotate & Rule – Mastering Array Rotation

Today’s challenge is all about rotation — but not on the dance floor! Given an array, rotate it to the right by k steps. Sounds easy? Let's break it down and explore three different ways to solve this classic problem.

The Best Data Structure for Solving It (and Why!)

Since the input is a simple array and we need to modify it in-place (if possible), there's no need for complex data structures. We only need:

  • An array (int[] nums): Our main data structure.

  • In some approaches: temporary arrays or helper variables.

The most optimized solution doesn't even require extra space — just clever pointer manipulation.

Different Approaches – Brute Force to Optimized Solutions

1. Brute Force (Rotate One Step at a Time)

This method rotates the array by shifting every element one position to the right, and doing it k times.


class Solution {
    public void rotate(int[] nums, int k) {
        int n = nums.length;
        k = k % n;
        
        for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) {
            int last = nums[n - 1];
            for (int j = n - 1; j > 0; j--) {
                nums[j] = nums[j - 1];
            }
            nums[0] = last;
        }
    }
}

Pros: Simple to understand
Cons: Very slow for large arrays or large k

2. Using Extra Array

We create a new array and place each element at its correct rotated position, then copy it back.

class Solution {
    public void rotate(int[] nums, int k) {
        int n = nums.length;
        int[] temp = new int[n];
        k = k % n;
        
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            temp[(i + k) % n] = nums[i];
        }

        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            nums[i] = temp[i];
        }
    }
}

Pros: Clean and efficient
Cons: Uses O(n) extra space

3. Reverse Method (Most Optimized – In-Place)

Reverse the entire array, then reverse the first k elements, then the rest. This gives the rotated array with O(1) space.

class Solution {
    public void rotate(int[] nums, int k) {
        int n = nums.length;
        k = k % n;

        reverse(nums, 0, n - 1);
        reverse(nums, 0, k - 1);
        reverse(nums, k, n - 1);
    }

    private void reverse(int[] nums, int start, int end) {
        while (start < end) {
            int temp = nums[start];
            nums[start] = nums[end];
            nums[end] = temp;
            start++;
            end--;
        }
    }
}

Pros: Fast and space-efficient
Cons: Requires understanding of reverse logic

⚠️Common Mistakes & Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Forgetting to take modulo (k % n): If k is larger than the array size, it will throw off your logic.

  • Mixing up reversal indices in the optimized solution.

  • Trying to use brute force on large arrays — it will time out in coding tests.

📊Time & Space Complexity Analysis

Brute Force
Time: O(n * k)
Space: O(1)

Extra Array
Time: O(n)
Space: O(n)

Reverse Method (Optimal)
Time: O(n)
Space: O(1)

🌍Real-World Applications

  • Data Shuffling: Useful in scenarios like circular buffers or ring queues.

  • Cryptographic Algorithms: Bit rotations are common in low-level code.

  • Gaming & Animation: Rotating elements in an array for level mechanics or effects.


I hope you found this article insightful! Keep exploring, keep learning, and don’t forget to check back daily for more exciting problem breakdowns. If you know someone who would benefit from this, share it with them and help them grow too! That’s it for today—see you in the next post!

                                                                                                                                         Signing off!! 

                                                                                                Master DSA One Problem at a Time :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trailing Zeros in Factorial – How Many and Why?

Trailing Zeros – Counting Zeros in Factorial Factorial-related problems are a fundamental part of Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA). One such classic problem involves counting the number of trailing zeros in N! . In this article, we will explore different approaches to solving this problem, optimize our solution, and examine its real-world applications. Optimal Data Structure for Solving the Problem For this problem, no additional data structures are required. Since factorials grow exponentially, storing the actual factorial value is impractical. Instead, we leverage mathematical properties and division operations to efficiently determine the number of trailing zeros. This approach ensures an optimal solution in terms of both time and space complexity. Approach – From Brute Force to an Optimized Solution Brute Force Approach – Compute and Count A naive approach involves computing the factorial of N and counting the number of trailing zeros. However, this method is highly ineff...
Read more

Divisible Drama — Who’s In, Who’s Out?

 Divisible Drama — Who’s In, Who’s Out? Problem Statement You’re given two positive integers n and m . num1 = sum of all numbers from 1 to n not divisible by m num2 = sum of all numbers from 1 to n divisible by m Your mission, should you choose to accept it: Return num1 - num2 Example Input: n = 10 , m = 3 Output: 19 Breakdown: Not divisible by 3 → [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 10 ] → num1 = 37 Divisible by 3 → [ 3 , 6 , 9 ] → num2 = 18 Answer = 37 - 18 = 19 Best Data Structure for Solving the Problem This one’s a math.  Why overthink it when Gauss already gave us the formula for sum of 1 to n? Different Approaches (from Brute Force to Optimized) Approach 1: Brute Force (aka List & Sum Vibes) Loop from 1 to n , split the nums based on whether they’re divisible by m , and sum them up. class Solution { public int differenceOfSums ( int n, int m) { int num1 = 0 , num2 = 0 ; for ( int i = 1 ; i <= n; i++)...
Read more

Zero Array After Queries

Zero Array After Queries You are given an integer array nums and a list of queries, where each query is a pair [li, ri] representing a range. Each query allows you to decrement any subset of elements in the range [li, ri] by 1. Your task is to determine if it is possible to make every element in nums equal to zero after applying all queries in order . Example Input: nums = [ 1 , 0 , 1 ] queries = [[0, 2]] Output: true Explanation: We can select indices 0 and 2 and decrement both by 1 to obtain [0, 0, 0] . Best Data Structure for the Job We are working with multiple range updates and need to evaluate coverage over indices. The best choice here is the difference array combined with a prefix sum . It allows efficient range additions and helps track how many times each index is affected by the queries. Different Approaches Approach 1: Brute Force This naive method iterates over every index for every query and performs the decrement operations directly. class Solution {...
Read more